🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic negotiations with Washington provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had been made by mediators to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the global atomic watchdog to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is treading a complex path since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a position of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Prior Discussions Suddenly Ended

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with the American leader declaring the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations exercised their authority to reimpose international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Offered

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Situation

Iran's diplomats said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if discussions restart.

Trump last week claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from the United States either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states negotiations is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the gathering, intended to paint the US as a dominant force that misuses the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the assaults started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making faith hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had repeatedly tried to dictate their will during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the final solution to address disputes, but its criteria, rules and principles must be followed."

"In case they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a response in the same approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this conflict; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, remains in place. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have developed more resilient, more integrated, and more backing of the administration and the country in the face of this assault."